Buita nomenclature -new names

Nigel

Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Nigel »

OK to save confusion here is the summary.

Butia capitata, name given to almost every Butia in the nursery trade regardless of what it actually is. If you buy a Butia capitata its a lucky dip of which one you actually get, but its unlikely to be capitata.
It is now formally the Butia from central Brazil , not generally in cultivation, a medium sized Butia ans probably not one of the hardier ones.

Butia odorata
This is the one formerly called capitata. Its a huge Butia from Southern tip of Brazil and Uruguay. This together with eriospatha are the two hardiest types.

Butia eriospatha
Huge Butia from mountains of southern Brazil,sees coldest winters of any Butia. Summers in the mountains are also cooler and it is the fastest growing of the Butias.

Butia catarinensis
Small to medium size Butia from coastal south Brazil. Synonym is Butia bonnettii. Remarkably hardy. Formerly called Butia odorata.

Various other species mostly from the paraguayensis complex but not generally available. The other sought after Butia is Butia yatay , but this one grows on hot sand plains with abundant water just below the ground, is notably slower than other Butias , needing more heat and can prove challenging.
flounder

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by flounder »

Thanks. I remember seeing some marked as butia capitata var. odorata. is this a cross or is it another generic term?
cordyman

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by cordyman »

Who officially changes/decides on the new classification?

Thanks for the clarification icon_thumleft
User avatar
Dave Brown
Site Admin
Posts: 19742
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:17 am
Location: Chalk, (Thames Estuary) Kent, England 51.5N 0.3E
Contact:

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Dave Brown »

ok, I didn't realise there was still a capitata, but the web sites still have it as hardy to about -12C which is now wrong by the sounds of it. My website is also incorrect as not all capitata are now ordorata :roll: Boy this is going to be a consumer/marketing nightmare.
Best regards
Dave
icon_thumright
_________________________________________________
Roll on summer.....
http://www.hardytropicals.co.uk
User avatar
Dave Brown
Site Admin
Posts: 19742
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:17 am
Location: Chalk, (Thames Estuary) Kent, England 51.5N 0.3E
Contact:

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Dave Brown »

cordyman wrote:Who officially changes/decides on the new classification?
It's the big botanical guys.
Best regards
Dave
icon_thumright
_________________________________________________
Roll on summer.....
http://www.hardytropicals.co.uk
GoggleboxUK

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by GoggleboxUK »

I bought mine as a Capitata but I assume its an oderata.

I assume Dave's ordorata is an oderata that shouts a lot and tells the others what to do.

:lol:
Nigel

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Nigel »

Butia capitata var odorata was the correct name for what is now catarinensis ,although I have seen it used for more than 1 species.

The whole thing is a big joke, nurserys just call everything capitata because thats the marketable name, and not going to change any time soon.

The review was conducted by Harri Lorenzi and Larry Noblick , two of the leading experts in the field.
It was neccessary because Butia capitata was still officially the name of 3 distinct and botanically different populations. Butia paraguayensis was an even bigger mess with a whole host of different Butias lumped in there.
Conifers
Posts: 13147
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:11 pm
Location: Northumbs

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Conifers »

Here's a review of what I presume is the main relevant text. Doesn't appear to be available online, unfortunately.

This paper (pdf) is also relevant.
Nigel

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Nigel »

Conifers wrote:Here's a review of what I presume is the main relevant text. Doesn't appear to be available online, unfortunately.

This paper (pdf) is also relevant.
Fantastic book, I recommend it.
Mr List

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Mr List »

so how hardy is Butia eriospatha
and where has them?
User avatar
karl66
Posts: 2646
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: halesowen. west midlands

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by karl66 »

ken, i would estimate -12 if planted out, a lot less in a pot!!. Although these temp's would have to be for short period's & i'd expect some leafburn. Nigel's your erio expert as i'm still on L plate's with them. karl.
Nigel

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Nigel »

It really depends on the length of the cold spell as with any palm. A short burst at -12C is probably survivable without too much damge. I would say -8C to -10C is where they show damage. A spell of cold with constant subzeros of two weeks or more might kill them at say -6C if unprotected, although I know of two examples that appeared dead from Dec 2010 that started growing back last summer.
Most winters have 1 or 2 cold spells where they might need protecting for a week or two to keep them looking nice.
A winter like Dec 2010 is another matter.
grub

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by grub »

I had two Erios , one was fine through two winters with lows of -9C as was my Odorata (this was before the name re-shuffle) the other stone dead. A winter of -12C saw off the other two :(
Nigel

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by Nigel »

grub wrote:A winter of -12C saw off the other two :(
I thought that too with a couple ,but they grew back last summer , never dig up a palm until its 3 years dead.
MikeC

Re: Buita nomenclature -new names

Post by MikeC »

Nigel wrote:
grub wrote:A winter of -12C saw off the other two :(
I thought that too with a couple ,but they grew back last summer , never dig up a palm until its 3 years dead.
Yep, made that mistake a few times in the early days when I thought a palm having brown leaves means it's dead. You dig it out and think, how odd, the roots all look healthy, but hey, no top growth it must be dead.
Post Reply